Key result
COVID-19 protocols for atrial fibrillation ablation reduced pre-procedure TEE use (68.4% vs 97.5%, P<0.001) and increased same-day discharge (68% vs 0%) compared to 2019, with no major complications.
Why the study?
Catheter ablation for AF was curtailed during the COVID-19 pandemic peak, and there was little data regarding peri-procedural outcomes of medical procedures during the pandemic.
Do COVID-19 protocols for AF ablation reduce healthcare utilization and maintain safety compared to standard pre-pandemic protocols?
Cohort (n=311)
Do COVID-19 protocols for AF ablation reduce healthcare utilization and maintain safety compared to standard pre-pandemic protocols?
Absolute Event Rate: 68.4% vs 97.5%
p-value: p=<0.001
Implementation of COVID-19 protocols for AF ablation, including selective TEE and same-day discharge, safely reduced healthcare utilization without increasing complications.
May support reduced utilization via same-day discharge in AF ablation; leaves open generalizability beyond this observational cohort.
Background: Catheter ablation procedures for atrial fibrillation (AF) were significantly curtailed during the peak of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic to conserve healthcare resources and limit exposure. There is little data regarding peri-procedural outcomes of medical procedures during the COVID-19 pandemic. We enacted protocols to safely reboot AF ablation while limiting healthcare resource utilization. Objective: To evaluate acute and subacute outcomes of protocols instituted for reboot of AF ablation during the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods: Perioperative healthcare utilization and acute procedural outcomes were analyzed for consecutive patients undergoing AF ablation under COVID-19 protocols (2020 cohort; n=111) and compared to those of patients who underwent AF ablation during the same time period in 2019 (2019 cohort; n=200). Newly implemented practices included pre-operative COVID-19 testing, selective transesophageal echocardiography (TEE), utilization of venous closure, and same-day discharge when clinically appropriate. Results: Pre-ablation COVID-19 testing was positive in 1 of 111 patients. There were 0 cases ablation-related COVID-19 transmission, and 0 major complications in either cohort. Pre-procedure TEE was performed in significantly fewer 2020 cohort patients compared to the 2019 cohort patients (68.4% vs. 97.5%, p <0.001, respectively) despite greater prevalence of persistent arrhythmia in the 2020 cohort. Same day discharge was achieved in 68% of patients in the 2020 cohort, compared to 0% of patients in the 2019 cohort. Conclusions: Our findings demonstrate safe resumption of complex electrophysiology procedures during the COVID-19 pandemic, reducing healthcare utilization and maintaining quality of care. Protocols instituted may be generalizable to other types of procedures and settings.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Barbhaiya et al. (2020) conducted a cohort in Atrial fibrillation (n=311). COVID-19 protocols for AF ablation vs. Standard AF ablation protocols in 2019 was evaluated on Pre-procedure transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) utilization (p=<0.001). COVID-19 protocols for atrial fibrillation ablation reduced pre-procedure TEE use (68.4% vs 97.5%, P<0.001) and increased same-day discharge (68% vs 0%) compared to 2019, with no major complications.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: