Heat capacities of poly(vinylidene fluoride) (PVF 2 ) and polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) have been measured between 5 and 100°K with an accuracy of (1–5)% by adiabatic calorimetry. Calculations based on contributions from known optical lines and the Tarasov continuum model are in good agreement with experimental results down to 30°K for PVF 2 and 10°K for PTFE, and yield characteristic temperatures θ 1 and θ 3 which are consistent with previous values determined from high‐temperature (100—350°K) data. At lower temperature the measured heat capacity is significantly higher [(30–100)%] than the model prediction, and can be satisfactorily accounted for by the introduction of localized vibrators at a concentration of about 1% as compared to acoustical oscillators and at a characteristic temperature of about 20°K. Using established data on polyethylene for comparison, the principle of additivity for heat capacities is found to be valid down to at least 20°K, convering the region (<60°K) where interchain vibrations contribute significantly to the heat capacity. Possible reasons for this unexpected behavior are discussed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Choy et al. (1979) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: