Why the study?
Does World Health Organization-Defined Metabolic Syndrome better predict coronary calcium than Adult Treatment Panel III Criteria in American men aged 40-49 years?
Does World Health Organization-Defined Metabolic Syndrome better predict coronary calcium than Adult Treatment Panel III Criteria in American men aged 40-49 years?
This study aims to determine if WHO-defined metabolic syndrome is a better predictor of subclinical coronary artery atherosclerosis (measured by CAC) than ATP III criteria in middle-aged American men.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
It remains unknown whether WHO or ATP III criteria better predict CAC in middle-aged men; this direct comparison may refine risk stratification if validated.
D etection of coronary artery disease,a major cause of death in the U.S., isimportant in primary prevention settings. The noninvasive screening method of electron beam–computed to-mography (EBCT) can be used to quantify coronary arterial calcification (CAC) and identify subjects with subclinical coro-nary artery atherosclerosis (1,2). However, EBCT screenings of all asymptomatic sub-jects is not practical in the clinical setting (3,4). Therefore, identification of high-risk subjects before EBCT evaluation is necessary. Currently, the metabolic syn-drome, a constellation of risk factors, is used to identify high-risk individuals over and above conventional coronary risk fac-tors because of the independent associa-tion of the metabolic syndrome with subsequent development of cardiovascu-lar diseases and diabetes (5–10). The pur-pose of this study was 1) to determine whether risk identification using meta-bolic syndrome as a criterion is useful for the detection of CAC with EBCT and 2) to compare the usefulness of the National
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Takamiya et al. (2004) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: