New computational methods for estimating relative pressure differences from PC-MRI velocity data demonstrate improved robustness to spatial subsampling and noise compared to existing techniques.
Enhances the reliability of non-invasive pressure estimation from MRI data; leaves open whether.
The relative pressure difference across stenotic blood vessels serves as an important clinical index for the diagnosis of many cardiovascular diseases. While the clinical gold standard for relative pressure difference measurements is invasive catheterization, Phase-Contrast Magnetic Resonance Imaging has emerged as a promising tool for enabling a noninvasive quantification, by linking highly spatially resolved velocity measurements with relative pressures via the incompressible Navier-Stokes equations. In this work, we provide a review and analysis of current methods for relative pressure estimation and propose 3 additional techniques. Methods are compared using synthetic data from numerical examples, and sensitivity to subsampling and noise was explored. Through our analysis, we verify that the newly proposed approaches are more robust with respect to spatial subsampling and less sensitive to noise and therefore provide improved means for estimating relative pressure differences noninvasively.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bertoglio et al. (2017) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: