Why the study?
Do agonistic AT1 receptor autoantibodies increase in unstable angina patients after stent implantation and stimulate VSMC proliferation?
Do agonistic AT1 receptor autoantibodies increase in unstable angina patients after stent implantation and stimulate VSMC proliferation?
Agonistic AT1 receptor autoantibodies increase after stent implantation in unstable angina patients and stimulate VSMC proliferation, suggesting a potential mechanistic role in in-stent restenosis.
May implicate AT1 autoantibodies in post-stent restenosis; hypothesis-generating and requires prospective validation before clinical consideration.
OBJECTIVES: Agonistic AT1 receptor autoantibodies have been described in patients with hypertension and preeclampsia. These autoantibodies could stimulate proliferation of vascular smooth muscle cells (VSMCs), which are involved in angiotensin II-induced vascular injury in cardiovascular disease. Hence, in this study, we explored the existence of agonistic AT1 receptor autoantibodies in unstable angina (UA) patients and the possible effects of them on the in-stent restenosis of these patients. METHODS: A total of 95 UA patients and 98 healthy volunteers were enrolled. The serum of each patient was analyzed for the presence of AT1 receptor autoantibodies by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Their effects on VSMC proliferation and c-fos and c-jun expression were studied in vitro. RESULTS: AT1 receptor autoantibodies were detected in 34/95 patients with UA. The incidence was 10.2% in the control group and rose to 47.37% after stent implantation. In vitro, this autoantibody had agonist-like activity, shown as stimulation of VSMC proliferation and upregulation of c-fos and c-jun expression. These effects were similar to that of angiotensin II and could be weakened partly by the AT1-receptor blocker valsartan. CONCLUSION: Our findings show that the autoantibody from UA patients has similar agonistic activity to angiotensin II and might play a role in the pathogenesis of in-stent restenosis in these patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tian et al. (2014) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: