Why the study?
Are plasma tissue kallikrein levels associated with the presence and severity of coronary artery disease in a Chinese population?
Are plasma tissue kallikrein levels associated with the presence and severity of coronary artery disease in a Chinese population?
Elevated plasma tissue kallikrein levels are associated with the presence of CAD but inversely correlate with its angiographic severity, suggesting a potential role as a biomarker for mild coronary arteriosclerosis.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
TK may mark CAD presence but inversely track severity; leaves open biomarker utility pending prospective studies.
OBJECTIVES: Tissue kallikrein (TK) has been shown to provide cardiovascular and cerebrovascular protective effects in animal models. The aim of this study was to investigate the relationship of plasma TK levels with the presence and severity of coronary artery disease (CAD) in the Chinese. METHODS: The study involved 898 consecutive CAD patients and 905 ethnically and geographically matched controls. CAD was angiographically confirmed in all the patients, and the severity of CAD was expressed by the number of affected vessel and coronary artery stenosis scores. Plasma TK levels were measured using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. RESULTS: Plasma TK levels were significantly higher in CAD patients than controls (0.347±.082 vs. 0.256±0.087 mg/L, P<0.001), and elevated plasma TK levels were directly associated with a higher risk of CAD (OR = 3.49, 95% CI 2.90-4.19). One-way ANOVA and multivariable stepwise linear regression analysis demonstrated that TK levels were negatively associated with the severity of CAD according to vessel scores (P<0.001) and stenosis scores (r = -0.211, p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that higher levels of TK in plasma are associated with the presence of CAD and are a predictor of mild coronary arteriosclerosis.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhang et al. (2014) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: