Why the study?
Does tissue kallikrein deficiency aggravate cardiac remodelling and decrease survival after myocardial infarction in mice?
Does tissue kallikrein deficiency aggravate cardiac remodelling and decrease survival after myocardial infarction in mice?
Tissue kallikrein deficiency in mice increases mortality and aggravates cardiac remodeling after myocardial infarction, suggesting a protective role for TK in post-ischemic heart failure.
TK deficiency worsens post-MI mortality and remodeling in mice; leaves open therapeutic relevance in human HF.
BACKGROUND: Tissue kallikrein (TK) is a major kinin-releasing enzyme present in arteries. TK is involved in cardioprotection in the setting of acute myocardial ischaemia but its role in post-ischaemic heart failure (HF), a major cause of delayed mortality after myocardial infarction (MI), is unknown. AIM: To determine whether TK deficiency in the mouse influences survival and cardiac remodelling after MI. METHODS: MI was induced in 10 week-old male TK-deficient mice and wild-type littermates. Survival was assessed up to 14 months. Cardiac morphological and functional parameters were serially measured by echocardiography. In another experiment, myocardial capillary density and NOS content were evaluated at 3 months. RESULTS: Infarct size was similar in both genotypes. MI resulted in severe cardiac dysfunction. Up to 12 months after MI, TK(-/-) mice displayed an increased mortality rate (P<0.05, relative risk of death=3.41) and aggravation of left ventricular hypertrophy and dilatation by comparison with TK(+/+) (+18% and +27% respectively, both P<0.05). NOS1 and NOS3 were abnormally regulated in the heart of TK(-/-) mice after MI. CONCLUSIONS: TK exerts a protective role in HF in mice. Coronary effects are probably involved. As partial genetic deficiency in TK activity occurs in humans, TK-deficient subjects may be at increased risk of mortality in HF.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pons et al. (2008) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: