Why the study?
Does 1-year low-dose amiodarone treatment improve long-term survival in patients with asymptomatic complex ventricular arrhythmias after myocardial infarction?
Does 1-year low-dose amiodarone treatment improve long-term survival in patients with asymptomatic complex ventricular arrhythmias after myocardial infarction?
A 1-year treatment with low-dose amiodarone after myocardial infarction provides a sustained long-term survival benefit that is driven entirely by the mortality reduction achieved during the first year of therapy.
Amiodarone was associated with lower post-MI mortality; hypothesis-generating and should not change practice without randomized confirmation.
BACKGROUND: In the Basel Antiarrhythmic Study of Infarct Survival trial, low-dose amiodarone improved 1-year survival in patients with asymptomatic complex ventricular arrhythmias persisting 2 weeks after myocardial infarction. To assess whether this beneficial effect persisted despite discontinuation of amiodarone after 1 year, the long-term outcomes of all patients of the amiodarone-treated group (initially n = 98) and those of the control group (n = 114) were assessed. METHODS AND RESULTS: After a mean follow-up of 72 (55-125) months, information on 96% of patients (203 of 212) was obtained regarding survival or cause of death. The probability of death after 84 months according to actuarial life-table analysis (Kaplan-Meier) was 30% for the amiodarone-treated patients and 45% for control patients. For the total follow-up, mortality remained significantly lower in the amiodarone group versus the control group regarding all deaths (p = 0.03) as well as cardiac death (p = 0.047). This mortality reduction was entirely due to the first-year amiodarone effect, since there was no significant mortality difference between groups when considering survival after discontinuation of amiodarone only. CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that the beneficial effect of amiodarone on survival in this high-risk group of patients persists for several years. In addition, the results stress the importance of early treatment after myocardial infarction, whereas the rate of sudden death and all cardiac death is low (1.6% and 4.1% per year, respectively) during late follow-up and therefore may not warrant further therapy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pfisterer et al. (1993) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: