Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This paper compares the formation of Si/SiO2 interfaces on Si(100) surfaces by two plasma-assisted processes with different C-atom removal steps: (i) by exposure to plasma-generated atomic H; and (ii) by exposure to plasma-generated atomic O. Studies of electrical characteristics and high-resolution transmission electron microscopy images have established that surface roughening, associated with the H-atom cleaning process, promotes a high midgap trap density through the creation of defect states at approximately 0.35, 0.55, and 0.75 eV above the valence-band edge, whereas exposure to atomic oxygen results in an atomically smoother surface having a lower midgap interfacial trap density, and with a single discrete trapping state at 0.35 eV.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ma et al. (1992) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: