Why the study?
Does TA-064 improve symptoms and cardiac function in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy?
Does TA-064 improve symptoms and cardiac function in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy?
The cardiotonic agent TA-064 improves symptoms and cardiac function in patients with mild dilated cardiomyopathy, but is less effective in those with severe baseline myocardial fibrosis.
Hypothesis-generating for TA-064 in mild dilated cardiomyopathy; should not change practice without randomized trials.
In 18 patients with dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM), the effects of a new cardiotonic agent, TA-064, given in both consecutive and intermittent (3 days on, 11 days off) oral doses were studied for 3 months by echocardiography and endomyocardial biopsy. After 3 months of consecutive administration, 11 patients (61%) had improved symptomatically and the %FS increased (p less than 0.001) and LVDd decreased (p less than 0.05), but the other 7 patients had not improved. At the pretreatment state these 7 patients in whom TA-064 was not effective had smaller %FS (p less than 0.01) and larger LVDd (p less than 0.05) than the 11 patients in whom the drug was effective. The non-effective group also had more severe myocardial fibrosis (p less than 0.05) and cellular hypertrophy (p less than 0.01) than the effective group. After 3 months of intermittent administration in 10 patients in whom consecutive administration had been proved effective, 7 patients sustained symptomatic improvement and increased %FS (p less than 0.01), but the other 3 patients did not sustain the improvement. The latter group had smaller %FS, larger LVDd and more severe myocardial fibrosis than the former group at the pretreatment state. These results indicate that the effects of TA-064 are dependent on the severity of basal cardiac function and myocardial damage, and that in patients with milder DCM, the effects can be sustained by intermittent administration.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Takarada et al. (1987) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: