Why the study?
Correct measurement of the aortic annulus is essential for TAVI success, prompting evaluation of the accuracy of novel imaging techniques by comparing MDCT and 3D TEE for optimal prosthesis selection.
Does three-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography provide accurate aortic annular diameter measurements compared to multidetector computed tomography in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation?
Does three-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography provide accurate aortic annular diameter measurements compared to multidetector computed tomography in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation?
3D TEE provides aortic annular measurements that are highly correlated with MDCT, suggesting it is a viable alternative for TAVI sizing when MDCT is contraindicated or unavailable.
Novel annulus measurement techniques may aid TAVI planning; leaves open validation in larger prospective cohorts.
Background and objectives: Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is a therapeutic choice for high surgical risk patients, serving as an alternative to open-heart surgery. Correct measurement of the aortic annulus, which leads to the selection of a suitable prosthesis and accurate outcome prediction, is essential for the success of TAVI. The objective of this study is to evaluate the accuracy of novel imaging te chniques in measuring the aortic annulus by comparing multi-detector computer tomography (MDCT) and three-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography (3D TEE) for the selection of the optimal prosthesis. Materials and Methods: Measurements of the aortic annulus have been performed on 25 patients using MDCT and TEE, and the correlation and agreement levels between the two measuring techniques were analyzed. MDCT measurements were used for the sizing of the prostheses. Results: MDCT and TEE measurements of aortic annular diameters were significantly correlated, with a mean difference of 0.001 cm. Conclusions: 3D TEE measurements have been in good agreement with MDCT and, therefore, 3D TEE can be used as an alternative in cases where MDCT is contraindicated or not available.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dima et al. (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: