Why the study?
In patients with cancer, clinical application of antineoplastic drugs results in severe side effects of cardiotoxicity, prompting a review of research on strategies to eliminate or reduce cardiotoxicity without compromising anticancer efficacy.
Do pharmacological and non-pharmacological treatments reduce antineoplastic drug-induced cardiotoxicity in patients with cancer?
Do pharmacological and non-pharmacological treatments reduce antineoplastic drug-induced cardiotoxicity in patients with cancer?
A variety of pharmacological and non-pharmacological strategies are being investigated to prevent antineoplastic-induced cardiotoxicity, with baseline and serial cardiac evaluations currently recommended.
Strategies to mitigate antineoplastic cardiotoxicity need rigorous testing; leaves open optimal agent selection for routine use.
Unfortunately, in patients with cancer disease, clinical application of antineoplastic drug results in severe side effects of cardiotoxicity. We aim to review the research focused on elimination or reduction of antineoplastic drug-induced cardiotoxicity without affecting its anticancer efficacy by different agens. This study is based on pertinent papers that were retrieved by a selective search using relevant keywords in PubMed and ScienceDirect. Based on mentioned purpose, various strategies were investigated and proposed, and thousands of compounds were screened. The literature mainly focusing on drugs, natural products and herb extracts with therapeutic efficacies as well as non-pharmacological treatment against differently induced cardiotoxicity during treatment in patients with cancers. Larger future studies are necessary to reach a point of secure cytostatic therapy, improved patient survival and quality of life. Until that moment, baseline and serial cardiac evaluation is recommended to facilitate early identification and treatment of cardiotoxicity.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Radonjic et al. (2018) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: