Why the study?
Does the N-Point Moving Average method applied to brachial pressure waveforms accurately estimate central aortic systolic pressure compared to invasive measurement?
Does the N-Point Moving Average method applied to brachial pressure waveforms accurately estimate central aortic systolic pressure compared to invasive measurement?
The N-point moving average method with a denominator of N/6 applied to brachial pressure waveforms provides an accurate, noninvasive estimation of central aortic systolic pressure.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Supports noninvasive central pressure research; leaves open outcome impact before clinical adoption.
The N-point moving average (NPMA) is a mathematical low-pass filter that can smooth peaked noninvasively acquired radial pressure waveforms to estimate central aortic systolic pressure using a common denominator of N/4 (where N=the acquisition sampling frequency). The present study investigated whether the NPMA method can be applied to brachial pressure waveforms. In the derivation group, simultaneously recorded invasive high-fidelity brachial and central aortic pressure waveforms from 40 subjects were analyzed to identify the best common denominator. In the validation group, the NPMA method with the obtained common denominator was applied on noninvasive brachial pressure waveforms of 100 subjects. Validity was tested by comparing the noninvasive with the simultaneously recorded invasive central aortic systolic pressure. Noninvasive brachial pressure waveforms were calibrated to the cuff systolic and diastolic blood pressures. In the derivation study, an optimal denominator of N/6 was identified for NPMA to derive central aortic systolic pressure. The mean difference between the invasively/noninvasively estimated (N/6) and invasively measured central aortic systolic pressure was 0.1±3.5 and -0.6±7.6 mm Hg in the derivation and validation study, respectively. It satisfied the Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation standard of 5±8 mm Hg. In conclusion, this method for estimating central aortic systolic pressure using either invasive or noninvasive brachial pressure waves requires a common denominator of N/6. By integrating the NPMA method into the ordinary oscillometric blood pressure determining process, convenient noninvasive central aortic systolic pressure values could be obtained with acceptable accuracy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Shih et al. (2014) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: