Why the study?
Does the N-point moving average (NPMA) method accurately estimate central aortic systolic pressure compared to the generalized transfer function (GTF) in subjects undergoing invasive pressure monitoring?
Does the N-point moving average (NPMA) method accurately estimate central aortic systolic pressure compared to the generalized transfer function (GTF) in subjects undergoing invasive pressure monitoring?
The N-point moving average method provides a simplified and accurate alternative to the generalized transfer function for estimating central aortic systolic pressure from radial waveforms.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
NPMA may simplify CASP estimation; leaves open equivalence to GTF pending clinical validation.
Objective: N-point moving average (NPMA) is a simplified method of central aortic systolic pressure (CASP) estimation in comparison with the generalized transfer function (GTF). The fundamental difference or similarity between the methods is not established. This study investigates theoretical properties of NPMA relative to GTF and explores the integer and fractional denominator for the averaging process in the NPMA. Methods: Convolution of a specified square wave and the radial (or brachial) blood pressure waveform constituted the NPMA. A single uniform tube model-based TF (MTF) was employed to investigate potential physiological meaning of NPMA. In experimental analysis, invasive, simultaneously recorded aortic and radial pressure waveforms were obtained in 62 subjects under control conditions and following nitroglycerin administration. CASP was estimated by NPMA (CASPNPMA), GTF (CASPGTF), and MTF (CASPMTF) from radial waveforms by tenfold cross validation. Results: Theoretical analysis showed that NPMA was an inversed constant TF. Its spectrum matched that of MTF in low frequency (NPMAand measured CASP to 0.0 ± 4.7 mmHg from -1.8 ± 4.6 mmHg for integer denominator of K = 4. CASPNPMAcorrelated with CASPMTFand CASPGTF(r2= 0.99 and 0.97, mean difference: -0.3 ± 1.8 and 0.5 ± 2.7 mmHg). Conclusion:This study demonstrated that NPMA is similar in nature to the GTF.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Xiao et al. (2017) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: