Why the study?
Coronary calcification contributes to stent under-expansion, but the impact of calcium severity on stent expansion in NSTEMI patients remained unexplored in this population.
Does a higher coronary calcium arc (181-270°) reduce stent expansion compared to a lower calcium arc (0-180°) in NSTEMI patients undergoing IVUS-guided PCI?
Does a higher coronary calcium arc (181-270°) reduce stent expansion compared to a lower calcium arc (0-180°) in NSTEMI patients undergoing IVUS-guided PCI?
Higher coronary calcium arc is associated with significantly less optimal stent expansion during IVUS-guided PCI in NSTEMI patients.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Association between calcium arc and stent expansion in NSTEMI is hypothesis-generating; prospective studies needed before clinical adoption.
Background: Coronary calcification indicates atherosclerotic plaque burden and contributes to stent under-expansion, leading to complications like restenosis and thrombosis. The impact of coronary calcium severity on stent expansion in NSTEMI patients remains unexplored in our population. This study aimed to evaluate the association between the coronary calcium arc and stent expansion in patients with non-ST elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) using intravascular ultrasound (IVUS). Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted at the National Institute of Cardiovascular Diseases (NICVD), Dhaka, Bangladesh from May 2019 to April 2020. A total of 109 NSTEMI patients undergoing IVUS-guided PCI for calcified lesions at NICVD were enrolled. Based on the calcium arc, 73 patients (0-180°) formed Group I, and 36 (181-270°) formed Group II. Stent expansion was measured. Ethical approval was obtained, and data were analyzed using SPSS version 23.0. Results: In this study, despite higher balloon pressures in Group II, acute diameter gain (1.5±0.4 mm vs 1.4±0.3 mm, p<0.03), acute CSA gain (5.8±1.2 vs 5.3±1.0, p<0.04), stent expansion by MLD (95.6±2.9% vs 89.6±3.3%, p<0.001), and MLA (92.7±5.1% vs 81.3±6.4%, p<0.001) were lower than in Group I. Stent expansion correlated negatively with calcium arc (MLD: r=-0.66, p<0.001; MLA: r=-0.69, p<0.001) but not with calcium length (MLD: r=0.14, p=0.1; MLA: r=0.09, p=0.36). Conclusion: Implantation of stents in calcified lesions results in less optimal stent expansion, especially in lesions with thick, eccentric calcific plaque layers.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Uddin et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: