Why the study?
Does high-pressure balloon inflation improve stent expansion and symmetry in moderate-severe calcified coronary lesions?
Does high-pressure balloon inflation improve stent expansion and symmetry in moderate-severe calcified coronary lesions?
High-pressure balloon inflations in moderate-severe calcified coronary lesions improve stent expansion but reduce stent symmetry, which may impact clinical restenosis.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May not yet alter practice in calcified lesions; hypothesis-generating for expansion-symmetry trade-offs.
Although significant coronary artery (CA) calcification is believed to affect stent deployment, the exact impact on stent deployment after high-pressure balloon inflations is unknown. Intracoronary intravascular examination (ICUS) was performed in 27 moderate-severe calcified CA lesions before and after stent implantation. In case of unsatisfactory results (in-stent area < 90%, minimal in-stent diameter/maximal in-stent diameter < 0.8), further inflations up to 20 atm guided by ICUS were applied. Initially, stent expansion was adequate in 10 stents (37%) and symmetric in 19 (70%). After inflation at 20 atm, stents with adequate expansion increased to 16 (59%, P = 0.0036), but stents with symmetry decreased to 13 (48%, P = 0.0045). Stent expansion was inversely correlated to the arc of calcium (r = -0.8, P < 0.0001). There were five patients with clinical restenosis at 6 months (18%). Increases in stent lumen area with high-pressure balloon inflations in moderate-severe calcified CA lesions are at the expense of symmetry. This may affect clinical restenosis.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Vavuranakis et al. (2001) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: