Key result
Scoring balloons show cost-effective promise for optimizing acutely underexpanded stents and improving clinical outcomes.
Why the study?
Stent underexpansion in calcified coronary lesions during PCI is a critical challenge with limited studies on the use of scoring balloons for acute underexpansion.
Do scoring balloons improve stent size and clinical outcomes in patients with acute stent underexpansion in calcified coronary lesions?
Observational
Do scoring balloons improve stent size and clinical outcomes in patients with acute stent underexpansion in calcified coronary lesions?
The use of scoring balloons for post-dilatation of acutely underexpanded stents in calcified lesions is proposed as a promising and cost-effective approach that warrants further evaluation.
May offer cost-effective option for underexpanded stents in calcified lesions; hypothesis-generating and requires prospective validation.
Stent underexpansion remains a critical challenge in the treatment of calcified coronary lesions through percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). It is a significant risk factor for in-stent restenosis, stent thrombosis, and adverse clinical outcomes. Although methods such as atherectomy, intravascular lithotripsy, and scoring balloons are used in the preparation period before stent placement, there is a paucity studies on their use in acute stent underexpansion. In this context, the use of scoring balloons for post-dilatation of acutely underexpanded stents offers a promising, cost-effective approach for optimizing stent size and improving clinical outcomes. Further studies are warranted to evaluate the efficacy and safety of this method in routine clinical practice.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Erdoğan et al. (2025) conducted an observational in Calcified coronary lesions with acute stent underexpansion. Scoring balloons for post-dilatation was evaluated. The use of scoring balloons for post-dilatation of acutely underexpanded stents offers a promising, cost-effective approach for optimizing stent size and improving clinical outcomes.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: