Key result
Bailout intravascular lithotripsy feasibility reported for treating acutely underexpanded stents in calcified lesions.
Why the study?
No consensus exists on how to treat acute stent underexpansion in heavily calcified coronary lesions despite extensive lesion preparation.
Case Report
Stent underexpansion in calcified lesions risks restenosis and thrombosis; case reports leave optimal preparation strategies open for prospective study.
Stent underexpansion is a common problem in heavily calcified coronary lesions treated with percutaneous coronary intervention, and has been associated with in-stent restenosis, stent thrombosis and, subsequently, poor clinical outcomes. Adequate preparation of heavily calcified coronary lesions (e.g. using non-compliant balloons, cutting/scoring balloons, rotational/orbital atherectomy or intravascular lithotripsy) prior to stent implantation is essential in preventing stent underexpansion. However, in certain cases the deployed stent may remain underexpanded despite extensive lesion preparation. To date, no consensus exists on how to treat stent underexpansion in this scenario. We present a cases series in which post-stenting intravascular lithotripsy was performed to treat acute stent underexpansion in heavily calcified lesions, describing the technical aspects, angiographic results as well as clinical outcomes at mid-term follow-up.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bingen et al. (2022) conducted a case report in Acute stent underexpansion in heavily calcified coronary lesions. Bailout post-stenting intravascular lithotripsy was evaluated. A case series described the technical aspects, angiographic results, and mid-term clinical outcomes of bailout intravascular lithotripsy for treating acutely underexpanded stents in calcified lesions.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: