Why the study?
Digoxin has a narrow therapeutic window increasing toxicity risk, particularly in geriatric patients, and the role of immune Fab in chronic toxicity cases remains uncertain.
Highlights the importance of regular digoxin monitoring and the potential utility of digoxin immune Fab in geriatric patients with dementia and chronic toxicity.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Vigilance for digoxin toxicity remains warranted in geriatric patients; leaves open questions on optimal contemporary monitoring strategies.
Digoxin, a cardiac glycoside and sodium-potassium adenosine triphosphatase inhibitor, has a narrow therapeutic index and is primarily prescribed for conditions such as systolic heart failure and atrial fibrillation. This narrow window increases the risk of toxicity, especially among susceptible populations. Although digoxin use has declined in recent decades and cases of toxicity have become less frequent, clinicians must remain vigilant, particularly with geriatric patients, who are more susceptible due to polypharmacy and reduced renal function. Here, we present a case of a 77-year-old woman with dementia who exhibited elevated digoxin levels and was successfully treated with digoxin immune Fab. While the use of immune Fab in chronic toxicity cases remains uncertain, our retrospective review of similar cases, managed both with and without immune Fab, provides insights into its role and limitations. We further underscore the importance of regular digoxin monitoring rather than checking the levels only during toxic episodes, as consistent monitoring can prevent fatal cases and reduce overall mortality.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bajoria et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: