Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Three hundred adult healthy earthworms (Eudrillus euginae) ranging length and weight from 14–29 cm (mean 21.5 ± 6.8 cm) to 1.6–3.0 g (mean 2.55 ± 1.1 g), respectively, were cultured in three different substrate for 70 days. The substrates were soil alone, (control T-1), cow (Bos taurus) dung and water hyacinth (Eichhornia crassipes) (1 : 1 T-2), and partially dried neem (Azadirachta indica) leaves with kitchen waste (1 : 1 T-3). The earthworms were grown in these substrates in a wooden chamber (0.8 m × 0.5 m × 0.2 m) and these were subjected to monitoring for various growth patterns (length, biomass, number) at every fortnight (five observations) interval. The observations showed that T-2 was the best among the three treatments used. There was significant difference (P < 0.05) between the mean values of growth efficiency in food conversion among the treatments. However, there was no significant difference (P > 0.05) between the mean values of survival rate of earthworm among different treatments.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chakrabarty et al. (2008) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: