Why the study?
Does the choice of hypertension definition impact epidemiological estimates of prevalence and control?
Does the choice of hypertension definition impact epidemiological estimates of prevalence and control?
The choice of hypertension definition significantly alters epidemiological estimates of prevalence and control, which has important implications for public health decisions.
Estimates of hypertension prevalence and control vary widely by definition; leaves open optimal criteria for surveillance and policy.
OBJECTIVE: To assess the impact of the use of different definitions on epidemiological estimates of hypertension. METHOD: The four most commonly accepted definitions of hypertension were applied to the 2353 subjects of a hypertension population prevalence survey in Québec. RESULTS: Depending on the definition used, the estimated prevalences of hypertension ranged from 9.6 to 19.9%, from 9.3 to 22.5% for men and from 9.9 to 17.4% for women. Successful control ranged from 15.5 to 68.1%. Regardless of the definition employed, lack of case detection was the main barrier to hypertension control, from 73.2 to 77.1% for men and from 34.6 to 62.0% for women. Lack of appropriate treatment or compliance, or both, was a more important barrier to blood pressure control for women than for men. CONCLUSION: This study shows that the choice of a definition has an important impact on clinically and epidemiologically relevant hypertension estimates for impending clinical and public health decisions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Eliane Franco (1996) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: