Why the study?
What is the inter- and intraoperator reproducibility of pulsed Doppler velocity measurement for estimating cardiac output in newborns?
What is the inter- and intraoperator reproducibility of pulsed Doppler velocity measurement for estimating cardiac output in newborns?
Pulsed Doppler measurement of mean aortic flow velocity in newborns has acceptable intraoperator reproducibility, especially when averaging three measurements, and low interoperator variability.
Supports averaging three pulsed Doppler measures to lower variability in neonatal cardiac output estimates; leaves open impact on clinical decisions.
Cardiac output (QAo) can be estimated noninvasively by pulsed Doppler (PD) ultrasonographic determination of mean ascending aortic blood flow velocity (VAo) combined with M-mode echocardiographic determination of ascending aortic cross sectional area (AAo). Cardiac output is calculated from the volumetric flow equation (QAo) = (VAo) X (AAo). Pulsed Doppler measurements are known to correlate well with Fick and thermodilution methods; however, inter- and intraoperator variability of the velocity component of the PD method has not been determined in newborns. We did three repeated PD measures of mean aortic flow velocity in ten term infants (using four trained operators) to determine inter- and intraoperator reproducibility. The coefficient of variation for intraoperator variability (random error) for a single measurement of VAo was 11.7%. If three repeated measures by a single operator were averaged, the random error was 7.0%. There was little interoperator variability found.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Claflin et al. (1988) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: