Why the study?
Does carotid endarterectomy or carotid artery stenting improve outcomes in symptomatic patients with 50% to 99% carotid artery stenosis?
Does carotid endarterectomy or carotid artery stenting improve outcomes in symptomatic patients with 50% to 99% carotid artery stenosis?
CEA and CAS are complementary revascularization strategies for symptomatic carotid artery stenosis, with selection depending on patient age, anatomy, and surgical risk.
May inform individualized CEA or CAS selection in symptomatic stenosis; leaves open need for updated RCTs with contemporary techniques.
Stroke is a major cause of mortality, morbidity, and disability. Carotid artery disease is the etiology for 15% to 20% of stroke. Carotid endarterectomy (CEA) reduces the risk of ipsilateral stroke and death in symptomatic patients with 50% to 99% carotid artery stenosis when the operative risk of stroke or death is less than 6%. Treatment benefit is greater with earlier surgery, more severe stenoses, and older age. Recently, carotid artery stenting (CAS) has emerged as a treatment option, especially in patients with high surgical risk due to anatomic or clinical variables. Nondisabling stroke risk may be higher with CAS than CEA, but the difference is narrowed with the use of embolic protection devices. The risk for myocardial infarction is lower with CAS than CEA. There is no difference in risk for disabling stroke or death. Worse results with new or low-volume CAS operators is a concern. CEA and CAS are complementary revascularization strategies. CEA may be preferred in older patients with complex anatomy or bulky plaques. CAS may be preferred in younger patients and those with restenosis, history of neck radiation, surgical contraindications, or surgically inaccessible lesions. The role for optimal medical therapy as an alternative treatment strategy remains to be defined. Nevertheless, all patients should be treated with lifestyle interventions and secondary risk factor control to target levels to reduce the risk of subsequent atherosclerotic events.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Menees et al. (2011) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: