Why the study?
Does carotid endarterectomy or stenting reduce stroke risk compared to medical management in patients with carotid artery stenosis?
Does carotid endarterectomy or stenting reduce stroke risk compared to medical management in patients with carotid artery stenosis?
This review reinforces that carotid endarterectomy remains the standard of care over stenting for most patients with carotid stenosis, though medical management is improving for asymptomatic patients.
CEA preferred for most carotid stenosis; leaves open optimal thresholds as medical therapy evolves.
Carotid atheromatous disease is an important cause of stroke. Carotid endarterectomy (CEA) is a well-established option for reducing the risk of subsequent stroke due to symptomatic stenosis (> 50%). With adequately low perioperative risk (< 3%) and sufficient life expectancy, CEA may be used for asymptomatic stenosis (> 60%). Recently, carotid angioplasty and stent placement (CAS) has emerged as an alternative revascularization technique. Trial design considerations are discussed in relation to trial results to provide an understanding of why some trials were considered positive whereas others were not. This review then addresses both the original randomized studies showing that CEA is superior to best medical management and the newer studies comparing the procedure to stent insertion in both symptomatic and asymptomatic populations. Additionally, recent population-based studies show that improvements in best medical management may be lowering the stroke risk for asymptomatic stenosis. Finally, the choice of revascularization technique is discussed with respect to symptom status. Based on current evidence, CAS should remain limited to specific indications.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Young et al. (2011) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched one closely related paper. Consider it for comparative context: