Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Case study reveals how interactional dynamics drive institutional change and prevent co-optation in social enterprises, indicating viable pathways for scaling industry-wide social impact.
Social enterprises are frontrunners in social innovation, yet our understanding of how they can scale their social impact beyond local, contained contexts remains nascent. To transform the institutional environment that gives rise to social problems, social enterprises must mobilize actors with divergent interests, values, and beliefs to change their practices – a process often complicated by incumbents who resist social innovation efforts and marginalize or co‐opt social innovators. Drawing on the social innovation and social movement scaling literatures, we identify a significant puzzle: how can social enterprises avoid marginalization and co‐optation while scaling their social impact? We address this question through an in‐depth case study of Tony's Chocolonely, a social enterprise dedicated to eradicating child labour in the chocolate industry. Our study offers two contributions. First, we show how social enterprises can scale their social impact beyond local, contained contexts by unpacking how different types of interactions and associated scaling outcomes create moral and competitive pressures for incumbents to change their practices. Second, we show how social enterprises can fend off risks of being pushed into a niche market or of being pressured to weaken the robustness of their solution, thus avoiding marginalization and co‐optation while scaling their social impact.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Klein et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: