Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Systematic review demonstrates parent-focused and multicomponent interventions achieve similar efficacy in children with disruptive behaviour, highlighting both approaches as effective options.
Background: disruptive behaviour represents one of the main reasons for consultation in the paediatric and juvenile population and is associated with high functional impairment that may extend into adulthood. Although evidence-based treatments with moderate effects are available, a significant percentage of cases do not experience substantial improvement. In this context, this systematic review synthesises the available evidence on outcomes associated with parent-focused and multicomponent interventions for children with disruptive behaviour. Method: following PRISMA guidelines, a search was conducted in four databases, selecting those studies that analysed the efficacy of each of the interventions in children with disruptive behaviour. The methodological quality of the studies was assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) tool. Results: the initial search identified 763 studies, of which 18 met the inclusion criteria and were analysed in detail. A narrative synthesis of the findings was conducted, which indicated that both intervention approaches had similar results in terms of efficacy. Conclusions: both interventions have been shown to be effective in the management of disruptive behaviour, with no conclusive differences between them. However, the need for further research with greater methodological rigour to obtain more robust and well-founded conclusions is highlighted.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Aguirre-Álvarez et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: