Key result
In isolated rabbit hearts, a 5-minute pulse of 10-50 mmol/L ethanol before ischemia significantly reduced infarct size compared to control (e.g., 17.9% vs 33.0%, P<0.05).
Why the study?
Does acute ethanol exposure reduce infarct size in isolated rabbit hearts subjected to ischemia and reperfusion?
Does acute ethanol exposure reduce infarct size in isolated rabbit hearts subjected to ischemia and reperfusion?
Absolute Event Rate: 17.9% vs 33%
p-value: p=<0.05
Acute ethanol exposure exerts dose-dependent cardioprotective effects when administered and washed out before ischemia, but abolishes ischemic preconditioning when present during ischemia in isolated rabbit hearts.
Hypothesis-generating in rabbit hearts; does not support ethanol use before ischemia in patients.
In the rabbit heart, acute ethanol exposure followed by washout before ischemia exerts a preconditioninglike effect. However, if alcohol is still present during ischemia, all preconditioning-related cardioprotection is abolished. The present follow-up study investigated the dose-response relationships of both the beneficial and detrimental effects of acute ethanol exposure. In the isolated rabbit heart either 2.5-, 5-, 10-, 20-, or 50-mmol/L ethanol was given as a 5-minute pulse followed by washout before 30 minutes of regional ischemia and 2 hours of reperfusion. Isolated rabbit hearts were also preconditioned with 5 minutes of global ischemia followed by 10 minutes of reperfusion (PC) before onset of 30 minutes of regional ischemia. This latter protocol was combined with a 35-minute infusion of ethanol at concentrations of either 5, 10, 20, or 50 mmol/L, starting 5 minutes before the onset of the 30-minute period of ischemia. Infarct size was determined with triphenyltetrazolium staining. No protection was seen with a 5-minute infusion of 2.5-mmol/L ethanol (29.9 +/- 1.6% of risk zone infarcted), and minimal protection was evident with the 5-mmol/L dose (25.4 +/- 3.4% infarction). In all other groups infarct size was significantly reduced (17.9 +/- 3.2, 18.4 +/- 3.5, and 16.8 +/- 3.4%, respectively, versus 33.0 +/- 3.0% in control group, P < 0.05). In the presence of 10-, 20-, or 50-mmol/L ethanol, infarct size following PC was not different from control (24.3 +/- 2.5, 28.4 +/- 4.3, and 39.0 +/- 4.0%, respectively, versus 28.5 +/- 2.5%). Thus the presence of alcohol during ischemia inhibited protection induced by preceding preconditioning ischemia. Only in the PC group exposed to 5-mmol/L ethanol was infarct size significantly smaller than in the control group (6.4 +/- 2.5%, P < 0.005). Thus both protective and antiprotective effects of alcohol were dose dependent with similarly low threshold doses in in vitro rabbit hearts. Since it might be impossible to find a dose of ethanol that would be protective if administered shortly before ischemia, ethanol should be removed before that ischemia to protect myocardium.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Krenz et al. (2002) studied Ischemia/reperfusion injury. Acute ethanol exposure vs. Control group was evaluated on Infarct size (% of risk zone infarcted) (p=<0.05). In isolated rabbit hearts, a 5-minute pulse of 10-50 mmol/L ethanol before ischemia significantly reduced infarct size compared to control (e.g., 17.9% vs 33.0%, P<0.05).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: