Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The phenomenon of surface charging caused by electrical discharges has attracted significant attention because of its adverse effects on electrical systems and its industrial applications. Since the surface charging and discharge current are both influenced by the charges generated during the discharge, it is important to study the correlation quantitatively. The primary goal of the study is to analyse the relationship between the discharge current pulse and the corresponding surface charge deposition for positive and negative excitation. To establish the relation, variations were introduced in two key parameters influencing the discharge process: the discharge medium (N2, CO2, and dry air) and the pressure (100, 90, 80, 70, 60 kPa) within each medium. The excitation voltage waveform is chosen to ensure the generation of only a single current pulse during the discharge. The positive excitation resulted in a higher pulse magnitude for N2and dry air, whereas CO2exhibited an opposite trend. The change in the current pulse is found to be directly proportional to the variation in charge deposition. The derived empirical formulas establish a linear correlation between the total charge computed from the current pulse and the deposited surface charge, verified by Pearson’s correlation coefficient which suggests a good correlation strength. Of the three gaseous mediums, CO2has shown a lower margin of error and consistent discharge results.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Saini et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: