Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
In this study, TiO 2 nanoparticles have been doped with fluorine (F‐TiO 2 ) and consequently sensitized with tetra(4‐carboxyphenyl)porphyrin (TCPP/F‐TiO 2 ) or zinc tetra(4‐carboxyphenyl)porphyrin (ZnTCPP/F‐TiO 2 ) to extend their light absorption into the visible region. The prepared photocatalysts were characterized by SEM, XRD, FTIR, and UV‐Vis assays. F‐TiO 2 nanoparticles were completely in anatase phase with particle size range of 50−200 nm. Fluorine‐doping of the TiO 2 nanoparticles led to a red shift in their absorption spectrum, while did not significantly changed their band gap (from 2.9 to 2.8 eV). ZnTCPP/F‐TiO 2 and particularly TCPP/F‐TiO 2 nanoparticles displayed improved visible light absorbency with decreased band gap values (1.5 and 2.4 eV, respectively). The photocatalytic activity of the nanoparticles has been studied through degradation of Rhodamine B in aqueous media under UV and visible light irradiation. The prepared photocatalysts showed lower activity than Degussa P‐25 under UV light irradiation. However, under visible light irradiation, F‐TiO 2 nanoparticles better photocatalyzed the RhB degradation than Degussa P‐25. Meanwhile, ZnTCPP/F‐TiO 2 and mainly TCPP/F‐TiO 2 nanoparticles were completely photoactive under visible light irradiation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rahimi et al. (2015) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: