Key result
Age under 50 linked to ~15-fold higher tele-palliative care consultation use vs. older patients.
Why the study?
Guidelines recommend integrating palliative care into heart failure management, but the factors influencing tele-palliative care utilization remain poorly understood.
Cross-Sectional (n=31,055)
Yes
Odds Ratio: 15.12 (95% CI 7.73–29.56)
p-value: p=<0.001
Tele-palliative care utilization in heart failure patients is higher among younger patients and those with greater comorbidities, but remains limited for those with higher socioeconomic deprivation.
Younger HF patients with higher comorbidity showed greater tele-PCC use; hypothesis-generating for equity-focused implementation research.
Background: The 2022 ACC/AHA/HFSA guidelines recommend the integration of palliative care (PC) in heart failure (HF) management. The potential of telemedicine to improve PC utilization among HF patients remains an area of active research. However, the factors influencing its utilization remain poorly understood. Objective: This study aimed to evaluate patient-level factors associated with tele-palliative care consultation (tele-PCC) utilization among HF patients admitted to a large health care system. Methods: A retrospective cross-sectional observational analysis was conducted on 31,055 patients admitted to University of Pittsburgh Medical Center hospitals with HF between 2017 and 2022. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify the predictors of tele-PCC utilization, and results are expressed as odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). The accuracy of the multivariate model was assessed using the area under the curve (AUC). Results: Patients aged <50 (OR: 15.12; 95% CI: 7.73–29.56; p < 0.001) and those with higher Charlson Comorbidity Index scores (OR: 1.130; 95% CI: 1.05–1.22; p = 0.002) were more likely to access tele-PCC. Patients with higher Area Deprivation Index (ADI) scores (ADI <20 vs. (61–80) [OR]: 0.43; 95% CI: 0.18–0.99; p = 0.048, ADI <20 vs. >80 [OR]: 0.40; 95% CI: 0.18–0.93; p = 0.032), closer to a tertiary hospital (<20 miles: OR: 0.21; 95% CI: 0.14–0.33; p < 0.001), and those receiving care in the pre-COVID-19 era (OR: 0.06; 95% CI: 0.03–0.11; p < 0.001) were less likely to utilize tele-PCC. No significant differences were observed based on gender, insurance type, or race. The multivariate model demonstrated strong predictive ability (AUC = 0.8996). Conclusions: We observed greater tele-PCC utilization among younger patients and those with higher comorbidity burden and during the postpandemic era, while socioeconomic factors such as those with higher ADI continue to have limited access. These findings underscore the potential of telemedicine as a tool to enhance PC delivery to HF patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kainat et al. (2025) conducted a cross-sectional in Heart failure (n=31,055). Age <50 years vs. Age ≥50 years was evaluated on Tele-palliative care consultation utilization (OR 15.12, 95% CI 7.73-29.56, p=<0.001). Patients aged <50 years were significantly more likely to utilize tele-palliative care consultations compared to older patients (OR 15.12; 95% CI 7.73-29.56; p<0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: