Key result
Palliative care consultation in heart failure patients was associated with an increased likelihood of a comfort measures terminal code status (OR 4.6, p=0.002) and inpatient hospice utilization.
Why the study?
While palliative care consultation has increased for many conditions, it has not increased in cardiovascular disease, and the impact of palliative care on terminal code status and setting of death in heart failure requires further analysis.
Does palliative care consultation affect terminal code status and setting of death in patients admitted with heart failure?
Cohort (n=334)
No
Does palliative care consultation affect terminal code status and setting of death in patients admitted with heart failure?
Odds Ratio: 4.6
p-value: p=0.002
Palliative care consultation in heart failure patients significantly increases the likelihood of transitioning to comfort measures and utilizing inpatient hospice services, though it does not increase the likelihood of dying at home.
Palliative care may promote comfort-focused decisions in HF; leaves open whether consultation improves outcomes or reflects selection of sicker patients.
OBJECTIVE: Determine the role of palliative care on terminal code status and setting of death for those with heart failure. BACKGROUND: Although palliative care consultation (PCC) has increased for many conditions, PCC has not increased in those with cardiovascular disease. While it has been shown that the majority of those with heart failure die in medical facilities, the impact of PCC on terminal code status and setting of death requires further analysis. METHODS: Patients admitted with heart failure between 2014-2015 at an academic VA Healthcare System were reviewed. Primary outcome was terminal code status. Secondary outcomes included setting of death, hospice utilization, and mortality scores. Student t-testing and Chi-square testing were performed where appropriate. RESULTS: 334 patients were admitted with heart failure and had a median follow up time of 4.3 years. 196 patients died, with 122 (62%) receiving PCC and 74 (38%) without PCC. Patients were more likely to have terminal code statuses of comfort measures with PCC (OR = 4.6, p = 0.002), and less likely to be full code (OR = 0.09, p < 0.001). 146 patients had documented settings of death and were more likely to receive hospice services with PCC (OR 6.76, p < 0.001). A patient's chance of dying at home was not increased with PCC (OR 0.49, p = 0.07), but they were more likely to die with inpatient hospice (OR = 17.03; p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Heart failure patients who received PCC are more likely to die with more defined care preferences and with hospice services. This does not translate to dying at home.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pham et al. (2020) conducted a cohort in Heart failure (n=334). Palliative care consultation vs. No palliative care consultation was evaluated on Terminal code status (comfort measures) (OR 4.6, p=0.002). Palliative care consultation in heart failure patients was associated with an increased likelihood of a comfort measures terminal code status (OR 4.6, p=0.002) and inpatient hospice utilization.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: