Key result
The addition of 1 mg of intrathecal midazolam to 0.5% bupivacaine significantly prolonged the return time of sensory block compared to bupivacaine alone (193.18 vs 124.81 minutes, p≤0.001).
Why the study?
The study evaluated the effect of adding intrathecal midazolam (1 mg) to bupivacaine (0.5%) on block quality, timing, and hemodynamic changes during inguinal herniation surgery.
Does adding intrathecal midazolam to bupivacaine prolong the duration of spinal anesthesia in patients undergoing inguinal hernia surgery?
RCT (n=64)
Double-blind
stratified random
Yes
Does adding intrathecal midazolam to bupivacaine prolong the duration of spinal anesthesia in patients undergoing inguinal hernia surgery?
Absolute Event Rate: 193.18% vs 124.81%
p-value: p=≤0.001
Adding 1 mg of intrathecal midazolam to bupivacaine significantly prolongs sensory and motor block and delays the first request for analgesia without causing hemodynamic instability in patients undergoing inguinal hernia surgery.
Hypothesis-generating for midazolam as spinal adjuvant in hernia repair; prospective RCTs needed before practice change.
Introduction: Inguinal hernia is the most common type of abdominal hernia which is 7 times more common in men than women. Surgical treatment is performed under general or local anesthesia (spinal or epidural). Neuraxial anesthesia has a greater advantage than general anesthesia. Today, spinal block anesthetics with local drug anesthetics along with adjuvant drugs is widely used for surgery. Midazolam is one of these adjuvants whose spinal injection, in addition to its appropriate analgesic effect, enhances the effect of local anesthetics. Aim: The aim of this study was to determine the effect of intrathecal midazolam (1 mg) to bupivacaine (0.5%) on the quality and timing of sensory block, motor block and hemodynamic changes during of inguinal herniation surgery. Materials and Methods: 64 patients with ASAI / II criteria (30-70 years old) were randomly divided into two groups of 32 patients under spinal anesthesia for inguinal herniation surgery. The anesthesiologist and the patient did not know the status of the studied drugs. Group 1 received 0.5 ml of bupivacaine 0.5% + 0.2 ml of normal saline and group 2 received 3 ml of bupivacaine 0.5% + 0.2 ml of midazolam (1 mg). The return time of sensory block and the return time of motor block, the time of the first request for analgesics, the degree of satisfaction and the hemodynamic status were compared between these group. Results: The return time of sensory block in group 1 was 124.81 ± 16.15 minutes and in group 2 was 193.18± 34.53 minutes, which was statistically significant and in group 2 the return time of sensory block was longer (001 ≤. ˂P). reaction block return time: in group 2: (140.43 ± 27.46) minutes, group: 1 (107.78 ± 13.82) minutes were shorter and statistically significant (P≤ .001). The time of the first analgesic request by patients in group 1 was 157.87 ±16.32 minutes and in group 2, 264.59 ± 50.17 minutes, which was statistically significant (P ≤ .001). Satisfaction index and hemodynamic changes were not significant between groups (P ˃ 0.05). Conclusion: Addition of 1 mg of midazolam in spinal anesthesia with bupivacaine 0.5% increased of the duration of analgesia and the time of first request for analgesia without changing the hemodynamic status in patients with inguinal herniation surgery.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kayalha et al. (2023) conducted an RCT in Unilateral Inguinal Hernia (n=64). Midazolam vs. Normal saline (0.2 ml) added to 0.5% bupivacaine was evaluated on Return time of sensory block (p=≤0.001). The addition of 1 mg of intrathecal midazolam to 0.5% bupivacaine significantly prolonged the return time of sensory block compared to bupivacaine alone (193.18 vs 124.81 minutes, p≤0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: