Key result
Intrathecal 0.5% isobaric levobupivacaine with fentanyl provided a significantly faster onset of sensory block (1.29 vs 1.51 minutes) compared to 0.5% isobaric ropivacaine with fentanyl.
Why the study?
The study was designed to compare the onset, duration of action, and sensory and motor block levels between 0.5% isobaric levobupivacaine with fentanyl and 0.5% isobaric ropivacaine with fentanyl in subarachnoid block for elective cesarean section.
Does intrathecal 0.5% isobaric levobupivacaine with fentanyl compared to 0.5% isobaric ropivacaine with fentanyl alter the onset and duration of sensory and motor blocks in women undergoing elective cesarean section?
Comparison
0.5% isobaric levobupivacaine with fentanyl vs 0.5% isobaric ropivacaine with fentanyl
Design
Double-blind randomized controlled trial
Authors
Loading...
Levobupivacaine may speed onset in cesarean spinals; extends RCT data on isobaric agents with fentanyl but leaves optimal selection open.
RCT (n=60)
Double-blind
Randomized using sealed opaque envelopes
No
Does intrathecal 0.5% isobaric levobupivacaine with fentanyl compared to 0.5% isobaric ropivacaine with fentanyl alter the onset and duration of sensory and motor blocks in women undergoing elective cesarean section?
Absolute Event Rate: 1.29% vs 1.51%
p-value: p=<0.001
Intrathecal levobupivacaine provides a faster onset of sensory and motor block, whereas ropivacaine offers a shorter duration of motor block and greater hemodynamic stability during elective cesarean sections.
Juneja et al. (2025) conducted an RCT in Elective cesarean section (n=60). 0.5% isobaric levobupivacaine with fentanyl vs. 0.5% isobaric ropivacaine with fentanyl was evaluated on Time of the onset of sensory block (minutes) (p=<0.001). Intrathecal 0.5% isobaric levobupivacaine with fentanyl provided a significantly faster onset of sensory block (1.29 vs 1.51 minutes) compared to 0.5% isobaric ropivacaine with fentanyl.
Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: