Key result
Guidelines provide a framework of reference for peer reviewers for the Journal of Vascular Surgery Cases, Innovations and Techniques and other journals.
Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Design
Editorial
Provides a framework and guidelines for peer reviewers for the Journal of Vascular Surgery Cases, Innovations and Techniques.
The quality of the Journal of Vascular Surgery Cases, Innovations and Techniques (JVS-CIT) depends on the quality of peer review. As surgeon scientists, reviewers, and editors, we share a common interest in moving vascular surgery forward, and there is no journal more uniquely suited to push these boundaries than JVS-CIT, which highlights cutting-edge innovations and techniques. Reviewers share the important responsibility of highlighting the duality of history and novelty in our field. The following guidelines provide a framework of reference for reviewers for JVS-CIT and other journals.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pitcher et al. (2023) reported an editorial. Guidelines provide a framework of reference for peer reviewers for the Journal of Vascular Surgery Cases, Innovations and Techniques and other journals.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: