Key result
Landiolol continuous infusion demonstrated a significantly shorter half-life (4.5 minutes) compared to esmolol (6.9 minutes) and provided faster, more pronounced heart rate reduction.
Why the study?
Does landiolol improve pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profiles compared to esmolol in healthy Caucasian volunteers?
RCT (n=12)
crossover
Does landiolol improve pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profiles compared to esmolol in healthy Caucasian volunteers?
Absolute Event Rate: 4.5% vs 6.9%
Landiolol demonstrates a superior pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profile, including a shorter half-life and more pronounced heart rate reduction, compared to esmolol during continuous infusion.
Favors landiolol for titratable acute rate control; extends PK/PD advantages of ultra-short beta-blockers in volunteers.
The pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, safety, and tolerability of long-term administration of esmolol and landiolol, a new fast-acting cardioselective β-blocker, were compared for the first time in Caucasian subjects in a prospective clinical trial. Twelve healthy volunteers received landiolol and esmolol by continuous infusion for 24 hours in a randomized crossover study using a dose-escalation regimen. Blood concentrations of drugs and metabolites, heart rate, blood pressure, ECG parameters, and tolerability were observed for 30 hours and compared. Drug blood concentrations and areas under the curve were dose-proportional. The half life of landiolol (4.5 minutes) was significantly shorter than that of esmolol (6.9 minutes). Volume of distribution and total clearance were lower for landiolol. Heart rate reduction was faster and more pronounced with landiolol and retained throughout the administration period; effects on blood pressure were not different. Landiolol turned out to be superior to esmolol with respect to pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profile and local tolerability.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Krumpl et al. (2017) conducted an RCT in Healthy (n=12). Landiolol vs. Esmolol was evaluated on Half-life. Landiolol continuous infusion demonstrated a significantly shorter half-life (4.5 minutes) compared to esmolol (6.9 minutes) and provided faster, more pronounced heart rate reduction.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: