Key result
Landiolol is associated with ~5 bpm greater heart rate reduction vs esmolol without increasing vasopressors.
Why the study?
Comparisons of Landiolol and Esmolol for heart rate control and hemodynamic effects in critically ill ICU patients were lacking.
Does landiolol improve heart rate control compared to esmolol in critically ill patients with tachycardia?
Observational (n=438)
No
Does landiolol improve heart rate control compared to esmolol in critically ill patients with tachycardia?
Mean Difference: 4.7 (95% CI 1.3–8.1)
Absolute Event Rate: 95.9% vs 101.3%
p-value: p=0.007
In critically ill patients with tachycardia, landiolol provided superior heart rate control and shorter ICU and hospital length of stay compared to esmolol, with potentially less impact on cardiac output.
Landiolol may achieve better heart rate control than esmolol without more vasopressors in ICU tachycardia; leaves open outcome benefits pending randomized confirmation.
Excessive tachycardia is associated with impaired hemodynamics and worse outcome in critically ill patients. Previous studies suggested beneficial effect of β-blockers administration in ICU patients, including those with septic shock. However, comparisons in ICU settings are lacking. Our study aims to compare Landiolol and Esmolol regarding heart rate control and hemodynamic variables in general ICU patients. This retrospective, observational study was conducted in a 56-bed ICU at a university hospital. A propensity score matching (PSM) was employed to balance baseline differences. Generalized estimating equations (GEE) were used to compare heart rate between two drugs. The primary outcome was heart rate control, while secondary outcomes included hemodynamic response, hospital length of stay (HLOS) and ICU length of stay (ICULOS). From June 2016 to December 2022, 438 patients were included after PSM, (292 in the Esmolol group and 146 the in Landiolol group). Baseline heart rate was similar between groups (Landiolol:120.0 [110.2, 131.0] bpm vs. Esmolol:120.0 [111.0, 129.0] bpm, p = 0.925). During 72 h. of β-blocker infusion, Landiolol reduced heart rate by 4.7 (1.3, 8.1) bpm, more than Esmolol ( p = 0.007), while preserving a comparable proportion of patients able to stabilize vasopressor doses within the first 24 h. (82.9 vs. 80.8%, respectively, p = 0.596). Norepinephrine doses and lactate levels were similar between groups over 72 h., while the Landiolol group exhibited notably higher minimal ScvO 2 levels (72% [63%, 78%] vs 68% [55%, 73%], respectively, p = 0.006) and a lower maximal PCO2 gap compared to the Esmolol group (7.0 [6.0, 9.0] vs. 8.0 [6.0, 10.0] mmHg, respectively, p = 0.040). Patients in the Landiolol group were observed to experience shorter HLOS than patients in the Esmolol group (26.5 [13.0, 42.0] vs 30.0 [17.0, 47.2] days, respectively, p = 0.044) and ICULOS (4.9 [2.8, 10.0] vs. 6.7 [3.4, 13.1] days, respectively, p = 0.011). Landiolol provides superior heart rate control in critically ill patients with tachycardia compared to Esmolol, without increasing vasopressor requirements during the first 24 h. Findings from ScvO 2 levels and PCO 2 gap suggest that Landiolol may exert less impact on cardiac output than Esmolol. Further studies, incorporating comprehensive hemodynamic monitoring, are warranted to clarify the clinical implications of heart rate control with β-blockers in ICU patients with tachycardia.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Si et al. (2025) conducted an observational in Critically ill patients with tachycardia (n=438). Landiolol vs. Esmolol was evaluated on Reduction in heart rate within the first 72 hours of drug infusion (MD 4.7, 95% CI 1.3-8.1, p=0.007). Landiolol provided superior heart rate control compared to Esmolol in critically ill patients with tachycardia, reducing heart rate by an additional 4.7 bpm over 72 hours without increasing vasopressor requirements.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: