Key result
Gender differences significantly impact cancer susceptibility, response to oncologic and cardiovascular therapies, and healthcare delivery in cardio-oncology, highlighting the need for further research.
Why the study?
There is limited knowledge regarding the effects of gender within cardio-oncology, particularly the impact of gender on cardiotoxicities.
This review highlights the critical need for further gender-specific studies to understand the cardiovascular effects of oncological treatments and improve personalized care in cardio-oncology.
Gender-specific cardiotoxicity data remain sparse in cardio-oncology; leaves open key gaps for targeted research before practice implications.
Gender differences exist throughout the medical field and significant progress has been made in understanding the effects of gender in many aspects of healthcare. The field of cardio-oncology is diverse and dynamic with new oncologic and cardiovascular therapies approved each year; however, there is limited knowledge regarding the effects of gender within cardio-oncology, particularly the impact of gender on cardiotoxicities. The relationship between gender and cardio-oncology is unique in that gender likely affects not only the biological underpinnings of cancer susceptibility, but also the response to both oncologic and cardiovascular therapies. Furthermore, gender has significant socioeconomic and psychosocial implications which may impact cancer and cardiovascular risk factor profiles, cancer susceptibility, and the delivery of healthcare. In this review, we summarize the effects of gender on susceptibility of cancer, response to cardiovascular and cancer therapies, delivery of healthcare, and highlight the need for further gender specific studies regarding the cardiovascular effects of current and future oncological treatments.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Simek et al. (2022) conducted a review in Cardiotoxicity in Cardio-Oncology. Gender differences was evaluated. Gender differences significantly impact cancer susceptibility, response to oncologic and cardiovascular therapies, and healthcare delivery in cardio-oncology, highlighting the need for further research.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: