Key result
Electrocardiography had limited value as a screening tool for right ventricular hypertrophy, demonstrating a sensitivity of 69% and a positive predictive value of 67% compared to echocardiography.
Why the study?
Does an electrocardiogram accurately diagnose right ventricular hypertrophy compared to echocardiography in children with suspected pulmonary hypertension?
Observational (n=76)
Does an electrocardiogram accurately diagnose right ventricular hypertrophy compared to echocardiography in children with suspected pulmonary hypertension?
Electrocardiography has limited value as a screening tool for right ventricular hypertrophy in children with suspected pulmonary hypertension due to its relatively low sensitivity and positive predictive value.
OBJECTIVE: Although the electrocardiogram is commonly obtained in the evaluation of patients with pulmonary hypertension, its value as a screening test for right ventricular hypertrophy or pulmonary hypertension is unclear. Therefore, we sought to determine the value of an electrocardiogram in the diagnosis of right ventricular hypertrophy using echocardiography as the gold standard. METHODS: We identified children without congenital heart disease who underwent evaluation for suspected pulmonary hypertension that included both an electrocardiogram and echocardiography within a specified time frame. RESULTS: A total of 76 echocardiography-electrocardiogram pairs for pulmonary hypertension were identified. Although there was a significant relationship between electrocardiogram and echocardiography evidence of right ventricular hypertrophy, the sensitivity of an electrocardiogram in diagnosing echocardiography-documented right ventricular hypertrophy was only 69%, and the positive predictive value was 67%. There was no relationship between electrocardiogram changes and Doppler tricuspid regurgitation gradient. CONCLUSION: Despite a statistically significant relationship between an electrocardiogram and echocardiography in the diagnosis of right ventricular hypertrophy, an electrocardiogram has limited value as a screening tool for right ventricular hypertrophy because of its relatively low sensitivity and positive predictive value.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Puchalski et al. (2006) conducted an observational in Suspected pulmonary hypertension (n=76). Electrocardiography vs. Echocardiography was evaluated on Diagnosis of right ventricular hypertrophy (Sensitivity 69%, PPV 67%). Electrocardiography had limited value as a screening tool for right ventricular hypertrophy, demonstrating a sensitivity of 69% and a positive predictive value of 67% compared to echocardiography.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: