Key result
ECG criteria show ~71% sensitivity for detecting height-indexed LVH in pediatric rheumatic heart disease.
Why the study?
Electrocardiographic criteria for left ventricular hypertrophy in children with rheumatic heart disease have uncertain sensitivity and specificity compared to echocardiographic diagnosis.
Does electrocardiography accurately detect left ventricular hypertrophy compared to echocardiography in pediatric patients with rheumatic heart disease?
Cross-Sectional (n=84)
Does electrocardiography accurately detect left ventricular hypertrophy compared to echocardiography in pediatric patients with rheumatic heart disease?
Electrocardiography serves as a moderate diagnostic modality for detecting left ventricular hypertrophy in pediatric patients with rheumatic heart disease, with sensitivity increasing in older children.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
ECG criteria warrant caution for LVH detection in pediatric RHD; leaves open validation and refinement in prospective cohorts.
Electrocardiographic criteria for left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) were examined in 84 unselected pediatric patients with rheumatic heart disease. There were 47 male and 37 female patients, ranging in age from 6 to 19 years. Electrocardiographic LVH was detected in 41 patients (48.8%), i.e. in 55.3% (26/47) of boys and in 36.6% (15/41) of girls. Echocardiographically determined LVH was present in 42 cases (50%) if left ventricular mass (LVM) was indexed for height, or 47 cases (56%) if LVM was indexed for body surface area (BSA). The overall sensitivity of height-indexed electrocardiographic diagnosis of LVH was 71.4% (95% confidence interval = 57.7% to 85.1%), while its sensitivity was 73.8% (95% confidence interval = 60.0% to 87.0%). For BSA-indexed echocardiographic LVH, the sensitivity was 68.1% (95% confidence interval = 54.8 to 81.4%) and the specificity was 75.7% (95% confidence interval = 61.9% to 89.5%). When sex-adjustment was examined, there was no increase of sensitivity of electrocardiographic LVH. Sensitivity of the electrocardiogram for LVH increased when age-adjustment was examined with 13 years of age as a cut-off point, both for height-indexed and BSA-indexed echocardiographic LVH. Reasons for the difference between these findings and the findings in adult patients (remarkably low sensitivity and very high specificity of ECG LVH) were discussed. Electrocardiogram was a moderate diagnostic modality in the detection of LVH in our pediatric patients with rheumatic rheumatic heart disease. Sex did not influence the sensitivity of ECG LVH, but older age group tended to increase its sensitivity.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sastroasmoro et al. (2019) conducted a cross-sectional in Rheumatic heart disease (n=84). Electrocardiographic criteria for left ventricular hypertrophy vs. Echocardiographically determined left ventricular hypertrophy was evaluated on Sensitivity of height-indexed electrocardiographic diagnosis of left ventricular hypertrophy (Sensitivity 71.4%, 95% CI 57.7-85.1). Electrocardiographic criteria for left ventricular hypertrophy showed moderate diagnostic utility in pediatric rheumatic heart disease, with a sensitivity of 71.4% for height-indexed LVH.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: