Key result
Controlled hemorrhage in a porcine model significantly increased pupil diameter (+0.03 mm/min; 95% CI 0.01-0.04) and allowed prediction of blood losses with a mean absolute error of 3.61-3.67 mL/kg.
Why the study?
Hemorrhage is a significant complication of trauma or surgery, making rapid and accurate assessment of patient condition crucial for management.
Do pupillometry parameters and parasympathetic tone activity predict blood loss during hemorrhage in a porcine model?
Do pupillometry parameters and parasympathetic tone activity predict blood loss during hemorrhage in a porcine model?
Mean Difference: 0.03 (95% CI 0.01–0.04)
Pupillometry parameters, specifically pupil diameter, increase during hemorrhage and can be incorporated into models to reasonably predict blood loss in a preclinical porcine model.
Pupillometry and PTA may aid hemorrhage monitoring; leaves open translation to human practice pending validation.
Hemorrhage is a common and significant complication of trauma or surgical procedures. Rapid and accurate assessment of a patient's condition during hemorrhage is crucial for management. The primary objective was to describe pupillometry parameters and parasympathetic tone activity (PTA) during hemorrhage. The secondary objective was to develop a model to predict blood losses. In this preclinical study, 15 pigs were used. After anesthesia, 35 mL/kg of blood was removed over 1 h. Hypovolemia was maintained for 90 min. Indirect assessment of autonomic nervous system balance was based on the monitoring of heart rate (HR), blood pressure (BP), shock index (SI), PTA and pupil diameter (PD). PD and the pupillary light reflex (PLR) were measured using a portable pupillometer. HR and SI significantly increased during hemorrhage, whereas BP decreased. PD increased significantly during hemorrhage (+0.03 mm/min, [0.01; 0.04]; then +0.01 mm/min, [0.01; 0.02]) and the hypovolemia period (+0.004 mm/min, [0.002; 0.005]). PLRs were absent in 251/254 measurements. Large variations in PTA parameters were observed over time, which prevented statistical analysis. The best models predicted blood losses with a mean absolute error ranging from 3.61 to 3.67 mL/kg. In conclusion, hemorrhage was associated with an increased PD potentially influenced by anesthesia. The selected models allowed reasonable prediction of blood losses with a slight tendency to overestimate. The study provides proof of concept for the use of this kind of models to predict blood losses. The results must be confirmed in other contexts: with different species, other anesthetic protocols, or different surgical procedures.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Magnin et al. (2025) studied Hemorrhage (n=15). Controlled hemorrhage was evaluated on Pupil diameter (PD) change during hemorrhage (MD +0.03 mm/min, 95% CI 0.01-0.04). Controlled hemorrhage in a porcine model significantly increased pupil diameter (+0.03 mm/min; 95% CI 0.01-0.04) and allowed prediction of blood losses with a mean absolute error of 3.61-3.67 mL/kg.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: