Key result
Transvenous iliac pacemaker placement was successfully performed in 5 patients post-Glenn operation, with all patients alive at a median follow-up of 4.1 years.
Why the study?
Does trans-iliac pacemaker placement provide an effective alternative to surgery for patients requiring permanent pacing after the Glenn operation?
Observational (n=5)
No
Does trans-iliac pacemaker placement provide an effective alternative to surgery for patients requiring permanent pacing after the Glenn operation?
Trans-iliac pacemaker placement appears to be a feasible and effective alternative to thoracotomy for epicardial pacing in patients with prior bidirectional Glenn operation.
May support trans-iliac pacing feasibility post-Glenn; hypothesis-generating and requires prospective validation before practice change.
INTRODUCTION: The bidirectional Glenn operation for congenital heart disease produces anatomical constraints to conventional transvenous pacemaker implantation. An iliac approach, although not previously described in this population, is potentially a preferable alternative to a thoracotomy for epicardial pacing. METHODS AND RESULTS: A single-center retrospective review was performed for all patients that underwent transvenous pacemaker implantation following the bidirectional Glenn operation with partial biventricular repair. Follow-up data, implant indications, and techniques were recorded. Five patients underwent a transvenous iliac approach (median age 26.9 years, interquartile range [IQR] 25.8-27.6). Pacing indications included AV block in 3 patients (2 requiring cardiac resychronization therapy) and sinus node dysfunction in 2. Implanted leads were atrial in 4 and ventricular in 3 (1 of the latter was placed in the coronary sinus). In two cases, transvenous leads were tunneled to a preexisting epicardial abdominal generator. Median follow-up was 4.1 years (range 1.0-16.7 years). One patient underwent device revision for lead position-related groin discomfort; a second patient developed atrial lead failure following a Maze operation and underwent lead replacement by the iliac approach. Patients were not routinely anticoagulated postprocedure given lead position in the subpulmonary circulation. At last follow-up, all patients were alive. One patient underwent heart transplantation 6 months after implant with only partial resolution of pacing-induced cardiomyopathy. CONCLUSIONS: Trans-iliac pacemaker placement may be an effective alternative to surgery for patients requiring permanent pacing after the Glenn operation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Harake et al. (2017) conducted an observational in Congenital heart disease post bidirectional Glenn operation (n=5). Transvenous iliac approach for pacemaker implantation was evaluated. Transvenous iliac pacemaker placement was successfully performed in 5 patients post-Glenn operation, with all patients alive at a median follow-up of 4.1 years.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: