Why the study?
Does transvenous pacing compared to epicardial pacing improve stimulation thresholds and reduce lead-related complications in pediatric patients requiring permanent pacemakers?
Population
71 children and adolescents who underwent permanent pacemaker implantation for sinus node dysfunction and…
Comparison
Transvenous pacing (n=22) vs Epicardial pacing (n=49)
Design
Cohort
Follow-up
3.4+/-3.8 years and 3.0+/-4.0 years
Authors
Loading...
May favor transvenous over epicardial leads when feasible in children; leaves open need for randomized confirmation of long-term outcomes.
Does transvenous pacing compared to epicardial pacing improve stimulation thresholds and reduce lead-related complications in pediatric patients requiring permanent pacemakers?
Transvenous pacing in pediatric patients offers lower acute stimulation thresholds and fewer lead-related complications compared to epicardial pacing, though steroid-eluting epicardial leads may be a viable alternative when transvenous access is not possible.
Jörg S. Sachweh (2000) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: