Key result
Cardiac MRI accurately diagnosed left ventricular non-compaction cardiomyopathy in a young man with a history of cryptogenic stroke, after prior echocardiography was non-diagnostic.
Case Report (n=1)
No
Cardiac MRI is a crucial multimodality imaging tool for accurately diagnosing left ventricular non-compaction in patients with cryptogenic stroke when echocardiography is non-diagnostic.
May support cardiac MRI when echocardiography is nondiagnostic in cryptogenic stroke; leaves open prospective validation.
A 28-year-old man arrived for an outpatient cardiac MRI (CMR) study to evaluate cardiac structure. At the age of 24 the patient presented with acute onset expressive aphasia and was diagnosed with ischaemic stroke. Echocardiography at that time was reported as 'apical wall thickening consistent with apical hypertrophic cardiomyopathy'. CMR revealed a moderately dilated left ventricle with abnormal appearance of the left ventricular (LV) apical segments. Further evaluation was consistent with a diagnosis of LV non-compaction (LVNC) cardiomyopathy with a ratio of non-compacted to compacted myocardium measuring 3. There was extensive delayed hyperenhancement signal involving multiple segments representing a significant myocardial scar which is shown to have a prognostic role. Our patient, with no significant cerebrovascular risk factors, would likely have had an embolic stroke. This case demonstrates the role of CMR in accurately diagnosing LVNC in a patient with young stroke where prior echocardiography was non-diagnostic.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kannan et al. (2014) conducted a case report in Left ventricular non-compaction (LVNC) and cryptogenic stroke (n=1). Cardiac MRI (CMR) vs. Echocardiography was evaluated on Accurate diagnosis of left ventricular non-compaction (LVNC). Cardiac MRI accurately diagnosed left ventricular non-compaction cardiomyopathy in a young man with a history of cryptogenic stroke, after prior echocardiography was non-diagnostic.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: