Key result
Percutaneous suction thromboembolectomy significantly reduced the prevalence of severe right ventricular dysfunction from 62% preprocedurally to 17% postprocedurally (P=0.031).
Why the study?
Surgical intervention carries high morbidity and pharmacologic therapy alone can be inadequate for patients with hemodynamic compromise, prompting minimally invasive alternatives to reduce clot burden.
Does percutaneous suction thromboembolectomy improve right ventricular function in patients with venous thromboembolism?
Observational (n=13)
No
Does percutaneous suction thromboembolectomy improve right ventricular function in patients with venous thromboembolism?
Absolute Event Rate: 17% vs 62%
p-value: p=0.031
Percutaneous suction thromboembolectomy is a feasible and safe option that significantly improves right ventricular function in patients with venous thromboembolism.
Initial AngioVac experience indicates procedural feasibility in high-risk VTE; leaves open need for randomized trials on safety and outcomes.
Venous thromboembolism is a leading cause of cardiovascular death. Historically, surgical intervention has been associated with high morbidity rates. Pharmacologic therapy alone can be inadequate for patients with substantial hemodynamic compromise, so minimally invasive procedures are being developed to reduce clot burden. We describe our initial experience with using the AngioVac system to remove thromboemboli percutaneously. We reviewed all suction thromboembolectomy procedures performed at our institution from March 2013 through August 2015. The main indications for the procedure were failed catheter-directed therapy, contraindication to thrombolysis, bleeding-related complications, and clot-in-transit phenomena. We collected details on patient characteristics, procedural indications, thrombus location, hemodynamic values, cardiac function, pharmacologic support, and survival to discharge from the hospital. The Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used for statistical analysis. Thirteen patients (mean age, 56 ± 15 yr; 10 men) underwent suction thromboembolectomy; 10 (77%) survived to hospital discharge. The median follow-up time was 74 days (interquartile range [IQR], 23–221 d). Preprocedurally, 8 patients (62%) had severe right ventricular dysfunction; afterwards, 11 (85%) had normal function or mild-to-moderate dysfunction, and only 2 (17%) had severe dysfunction ( P =0.031). Percutaneous suction thromboembolectomy, a promising therapeutic option for patients, appears to be safe, and we found it to be associated with improved right ventricular function.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Akhmerov et al. (2019) conducted an observational in Venous thromboembolism (n=13). Percutaneous suction thromboembolectomy vs. Preprocedural baseline was evaluated on Severe right ventricular dysfunction (p=0.031). Percutaneous suction thromboembolectomy significantly reduced the prevalence of severe right ventricular dysfunction from 62% preprocedurally to 17% postprocedurally (P=0.031).
Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: