Why the study?
Does ephedrine compared to phenylephrine produce a more durable pressor response and increase in cardiac output in patients undergoing lumbar spine surgery in the prone position under general anesthesia?
Does ephedrine compared to phenylephrine produce a more durable pressor response and increase in cardiac output in patients undergoing lumbar spine surgery in the prone position under general anesthesia?
In patients undergoing lumbar spine surgery in the prone position under general anesthesia, bolus ephedrine produces a more persistent pressor response and durable increase in cardiac output compared with phenylephrine.
Ephedrine may be preferred over phenylephrine for sustained hemodynamic support in prone spine surgery; extends RCT data on vasopressor selection.
Ephedrine and phenylephrine (PE) are vasoconstrictors commonly used to restore the blood pressure (BP) to normal values. The aim of the present study was to investigate the effects of ephedrine and PE bolus administration on intra-arterial systolic BP (ISBP), intra-arterial diastolic BP (IDBP) and cardiac output (CO) in patients undergoing lumbar spine surgery in the prone position under general anesthesia (GA). In this prospective, randomized, and double-blind study, a total of 60 patients aged 20-60 years and undergoing elective lumbar spine surgery were administered either a single dose of ephedrine (0.1 mg/kg) or PE (1 µg/kg) through a central venous catheter as a bolus injection following the achievement of a stable hemodynamic status for ≥10 min. Following bolus injection of ephedrine or PE, a significant increase in ISBP was observed in the two experimental groups compared with pre-ephedrine and pre-PE values. The duration of the increment in ISBP however was significantly longer in the ephedrine group compared with the PE group. A similar response was observed in IDBP. A significant increase in CO began 1 min following ephedrine injection and lasted for the entire observation period, whereas the increase was only sustained for 3 min following bolus injection in the PE group. The results of the present study demonstrated that bolus ephedrine produces a more persistent pressor response and durable increase in CO and CI compared with PE when patients are in the prone position with GA for spine surgery.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Xia et al. (2016) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: