Why the study?
Does novel speckle tracking strain rate analysis detect a higher prevalence of diastolic dysfunction compared to conventional echocardiography in chronic dialysis patients?
Does novel speckle tracking strain rate analysis detect a higher prevalence of diastolic dysfunction compared to conventional echocardiography in chronic dialysis patients?
Novel speckle tracking strain rate analysis detects a higher prevalence of diastolic dysfunction in dialysis patients compared to conventional echocardiography, with LV mass and pulse wave velocity as key determinants.
May enhance diastolic dysfunction detection in dialysis; leaves open prognostic value and practice change.
Background. Diastolic dysfunction is common among dialysis patients and is associated with increased morbidity and mortality. Novel echocardiographic speckle tracking strain analysis permits accurate assessment of left ventricular diastolic function, independent of loading conditions and taking all myocardial segments into account. The aim of the study was to evaluate the prevalence of diastolic dysfunction in chronic dialysis patients using this novel technique, and to identify its determinants among clinical and echocardiographic variables. Methods. Patients currently enrolled in the ICD2 study protocol were included for this analysis. Next to conventional echo measurements diastolic function was also assessed by global diastolic strain rate during isovolumic relaxation (SRIVR). Results. A total of 77 patients were included (age 67 ± 8 years, 74% male). When defined as E/SRIVR ≥236, the prevalence of diastolic dysfunction was higher compared to more conventional measurements (48% versus 39%). Left ventricular mass (OR 1.02, 95% CI 1.00-1.04, P = 0.014) and pulse wave velocity (OR 1.34, 95% CI 1.07-1.68, P = 0.01) were independent determinants of diastolic dysfunction. Conclusion. Diastolic dysfunction is highly prevalent among dialysis patients and might be underestimated using conventional measurements. Left ventricular mass and pulse wave velocity were the only determinants of diastolic dysfunction in these patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bie et al. (2012) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: