Why the study?
Does point-of-care testing (POCT) improve bleeding and anticoagulation management compared to routine laboratory tests in adult ECMO patients?
Does point-of-care testing (POCT) improve bleeding and anticoagulation management compared to routine laboratory tests in adult ECMO patients?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Point-of-care testing offers a promising, comprehensive alternative to routine laboratory tests for managing complex haemostatic challenges in adult ECMO patients.
Haemostatic perturbations are commonly seen in extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) patients and remain a clinical challenge, contributing significantly to morbidity and mortality. The approach to anticoagulation monitoring and the management of bleeding varies considerably across ECMO centres. Routine laboratory tests have their limitations in terms of turnaround time and specificity of information provided. Newer point-of-care testing (POCT) for coagulation may overcome these issues, as it provides information about the entire coagulation pathway from clot initiation to lysis. It is also possible to obtain qualitative information on platelet function from these tests. Furthermore, the ability to incorporate these results into a goal-directed algorithm to manage bleeding with targeted transfusion strategies appears particularly attractive and cost effective. Further studies are required to evaluate the utility of POCT to optimise bleeding and anticoagulation management in these complex patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Venkatesh et al. (2016) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: