What question did this study set out to answer?

To examine the ethical duties, solidarity practices, and social accountability of feminist scientists navigating overlapping crises of systemic racism, public health emergencies, and anti-science sentiment.

November 7, 2020Catalyst Feminism Theory TechnoscienceOpen Access

Coalition-Making and the Practice of Feminist STS in the time of COVID-19

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Authors

HFHannah Fitsch RJRebecca Jordan‐Young AKAnelis Kaiser

Discussion

Member takes

Overview

Collaborative dialogue explores feminist scientific accountability amid systemic racism and pandemic crises, highlighting pathways for solidarity.

Key Points

To examine the ethical duties, solidarity practices, and social accountability of feminist scientists navigating overlapping crises of systemic racism, public health emergencies, and anti-science sentiment.
Convened a structured collaborative dialogue among six interdisciplinary scholars from the NeuroGenderings Network with a ten-year history of shared scholarship.
Synthesized critical perspectives across science and technology studies (STS) and feminist critique to evaluate scientific responsibility during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Identified critical frameworks for scientific accountability that explicitly integrate anti-racism and social justice into research practices.
Highlighted the necessity of coalition-making between scientific practitioners and justice movements to resist both scientific complacency and anti-science rhetoric.

Cite This Study

Fitsch et al. (2020) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a87344e854ced5b0ecf8076 https://doi.org/10.28968/cftt.v6i2.34640

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

November 7, 2020Catalyst Feminism Theory TechnoscienceOpen Access

Coalition-Making and the Practice of Feminist STS in the time of COVID-19

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Authors

HFHannah Fitsch RJRebecca Jordan‐Young AKAnelis Kaiser

Discussion

Member takes

Overview

Collaborative dialogue explores feminist scientific accountability amid systemic racism and pandemic crises, highlighting pathways for solidarity.

Key Points

To examine the ethical duties, solidarity practices, and social accountability of feminist scientists navigating overlapping crises of systemic racism, public health emergencies, and anti-science sentiment.
Convened a structured collaborative dialogue among six interdisciplinary scholars from the NeuroGenderings Network with a ten-year history of shared scholarship.
Synthesized critical perspectives across science and technology studies (STS) and feminist critique to evaluate scientific responsibility during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Identified critical frameworks for scientific accountability that explicitly integrate anti-racism and social justice into research practices.
Highlighted the necessity of coalition-making between scientific practitioners and justice movements to resist both scientific complacency and anti-science rhetoric.

Cite This Study

Fitsch et al. (2020) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a87344e854ced5b0ecf8076 https://doi.org/10.28968/cftt.v6i2.34640

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark