Why the study?
Does the STAR nonlinear model-based glycemic control protocol provide safe and effective glycemic control across different intensive care units in critically ill patients?
Does the STAR nonlinear model-based glycemic control protocol provide safe and effective glycemic control across different intensive care units in critically ill patients?
The STAR nonlinear model-based glycemic control protocol provides highly effective and safe blood glucose management in critically ill patients across different ICU settings.
Supports STAR for safe ICU glycemic control; leaves open randomized confirmation before practice change.
Critically ill patients exhibit a highly complex and dynamic metabolic state, making safe, effective management of hyperglycemia difficult. Clinical practices vary significantly, thus making glycemic control (GC) protocols difficult to generalize across units. This study examines the generalizability of a nonlinear, model-based GC protocol, STAR (Stochastic TARgeted), across two different intensive care units (ICUs) with very different practices and use of GC. Patient data from the ICUs at Christchurch Hospital, New Zealand (267 Patients) and Kalman Pandy Hospital, Hungary (47 Patients) are examined. Safety and performance are examined, where complete generalizability would be indicated by similar glycemic performance distributions using non-parametric statistics as appropriate. STAR spent over 86% of time in the target BG band of 4.4-8.0 mmol/L per-episode in both Christchurch and Gyula, with the BG (blood glucose) distributions being almost identical. STAR provided safe GC with very few patients experiencing mild hypoglycemia (< 5 patients, 1.5%). The nonlinear model-based STAR GC protocol delivered equivalent high performance and safety across patient types, time, clinical practice culture, and clinical resources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Stewart et al. (2016) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: