Why the study?
The intra- and inter-examiner reliability of heart rate variability analysis using a Polar cardio frequency meter in individuals with chronic nonspecific low back pain needed to be evaluated.
Does the Polar V800 cardio frequency meter provide reliable measurements of heart rate variability in individuals with chronic low back pain?
Does the Polar V800 cardio frequency meter provide reliable measurements of heart rate variability in individuals with chronic low back pain?
The Polar V800 cardio frequency meter is a reliable tool for measuring heart rate variability in different positions and across different examiners in patients with chronic low back pain.
May support Polar-based HRV monitoring in chronic low back pain; leaves open validation against clinical outcomes.
Objective: The purpose of this study was to analyze the intra- and inter-examiner reliability of the analysis of heart rate variability (HRV) captured by a Polar cardio frequency meter in individuals with chronic nonspecific low back pain. Methods: The study included 35 individuals with nonspecific low back pain, both sexes, aged 18 to 45. We used a Polar V800 cardio frequency meter to capture HRV in individuals in different positions, and we calculated the reliability through the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Results: Regarding intra-examiner reliability, we found excellent reliability of HRV analysis in the supine position (ICC ranging from 0.89 to 1.00) and in the standing position (ICC ranging from 0.95 to 0.99). In addition, for inter-examiner reliability, we found substantial to excellent reliability of the HRV analysis in the supine position (ICC ranging from 0.76 to 0.98) and moderate to excellent reliability in the standing position (ICC ranging from 0.73 to 0.99). Conclusion: The HRV analysis captured by a Polar cardio frequency meter presented adequate reliability when considering different times and different examiners.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Penha et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: